🔗 Share this article

Just two days before the NYC mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange made a bold electoral prediction – going beyond who would win overall, and block by block. The analyst, a political analyst born and raised in New York City, has spent over a decade in left-leaning activism and emerged as something of a well-known figure recently for his deep dives into municipal statistics and polling.

He released his highly detailed forecast map – which correctly forecast that Zohran Mamdani was victorious while failed to predict the independent candidate’s solid showing – on his Substack, his platform. He possesses a talent for clever terms. He highlighted, for instance, the divide between the “commie corridor”, stretching from Park Slope to another area to Astoria, where he predicted (correctly) that Mamdani would triumph by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. In those areas, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal surpass the mainstream paper” in readership and most voters favored the independent, who ran as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Trends and Surprises

How was your night?

I had to do that because they were dropping around 200,000 ballots into the system frequently! I was actually somewhat anxious initially: Mamdani led the early vote by 12 points, but came two big batches of ballots that came in after that and the advantage dropped from 12 to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, there was a world where election day turned out somewhat badly for him, in which Cuomo would have essentially doubling his votes from the earlier contest. But the winner added half a million supporters to his initial base, and this was critical why he succeeded. He campaigned and massively expanded his base from the primary.

Expanding Support

How did the mayor-elect gain additional support from?

He built the coalition that the left always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, it’s young, it’s renters and individuals squeezed by affordability. He improved significantly with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, compared to the earlier election. Additionally he boosted his base of liberal progressives, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He created the alliance that the left long aimed for: multiracial, youthful, renters and residents struggling with costs

Additionally, there were a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, confined to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Muslims. Voters in immigrant strongholds that went for the former president previously went for Zohran this year. But I wouldn’t say he was gaining white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Voter Participation and Impact

One of the big stories of the election was the sky-high turnout. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Participation was much greater than anticipated. I figured it could go over 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – that is a lot of darn voters. Existed a decent opposition group, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that sufficed to win.

You predicted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Right now you would say he’s likely to get over 50%. He’s at 50.4% but remain around 200K ballots left to report as of Wednesday morning. So it’s not certain, but I think it’s likely, and I hope he does so afterwards none can claim the Republican was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His vote completely collapsed.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any borough. Not even Tottenville in Staten Island, which is like an 88% Trump area. That truly surprised me. Cuomo kept very white areas, affluent zones and devout communities, and plus gained many conservatives on the island with a strong turnout. I believe there was a lot of tactical voting by the Republicans. This happened before the former president tweeted his support for Cuomo, but it assisted. It could have even turned the tide if the winning alliance failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your much mentioned left-wing base – did backing for Mamdani overwhelming in those parts of the boroughs?

I think existed some weakening of the progressive zone in some areas like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, instance, the Greek landlords and homeowners all went for Cuomo. Thus there was some opposition. But no, largely the leftist base is another huge reason why Mamdani won – he was polling between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

Prior to the election we reported on if Mamdani was making inroads with the community. Any indication that he succeeded?

Exist areas with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – like specific locales – where he did well. But in the wealthy Jewish communities such as the Upper East Side, his position on Israel was influential in those places. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas like Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored the independent. Plus, there are Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in the borough, they were strongly supportive. So it’s unclear if existed crazy narrative-busters on this one, but he retained left-leaning areas and including sections of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York means politically? Will the commie corridor serve as a springboard for leftwing candidates?

Absolutely, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest figures from progressives hail from a few areas in the boroughs. I believe that we’ll see additional examples – candidates will emerge from these areas to be elevated nationally.

But I believe that every city in the US could develop similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the centers of progressive influence in the nation – because youth reside there, tenancy is common and they represent locales where people are crushed by the inequalities exist.